(171 spins)Īfter only 10 cycles we had a cycle without a single win. On the past spins and the so-called fallacy. This prediction and 22 continuous winning cycles are based only Never a 0 win cycle, 100% accuracy in prediction. The amount of wins per cycle based on these predicted numbers : Spins at the beginning (114 spins) where this group did not appear once. Had a win on this set of 5 numbers, as compared to the qualification Through the next 38 spins (1 complete cycle) we haveĨ38 played spins and not once was I wrong, every cycle of 38 spins On past spins alone playing only 5 numbers. NOT have 0 shows during future 38 spin cycles - meaning I can predict a win based I can make a prediction (based on past spins) that this group of 5 as a group will Let's run off an example, because it so easy to prove that this 'Fallacy' is noįallacy at all but is instead a predictable event.Īfter 114 spins we have 5 numbers that haven't appeared.ĪS A GROUP - are they now expected to appear 'above average', 'catch up', are Certainly one of the more interesting topics in roulette is that of the

Gambling forum com